Harassment campaign targets USA Today journalists

In early January, USA Today reporter Tom Vanden Brook started asking questions about the U.S. military’s “information operations” program, which has spent hundreds of millions of dollars on poorly tracked marketing and propaganda campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Vanden Brook

A short time later somebody created websites TomVandenBrook.com and RayLocker.com — Locker is Vanden Brook’s editor — to harass the journalists. The sites were taken down after the Pentagon began investigating. Also, USA Today reports:

Fake Twitter and Facebook accounts have been created in their names, along with a Wikipedia entry and dozens of message board postings and blog comments.

“I find it creepy and cowardly that somebody would hide behind my name and presumably make up other names in an attempt to undermine my credibility,” Vanden Brook tells his paper.

Locker tells Erik Wemple that this campaign is “something I’ve never experienced in 30 years” as a journalist in this business. He calls the intimidation attempt “a little bit of a distraction,” but “I think it’s good that we called attention to it” in today’s paper.

Meanwhile, Vanden Brook is still on the story. “If they thought it would deter me from writing about this, they’re wrong.”

* Misinformation campaign targets USA Today reporter, editor (USA Today)
* USA Today alleges harassment scheme (Washington Post)

Comments

comments

6 comments
  1. Dave Barnes said:

    “I find it creepy and cowardly…Vanden Brook tells his paper.
    Really?
    I find it stupid that you did not buy your own domain name.

  2. Nice try at changing the subject, Dave.

  3. Dave Barnes said:

    Dear Bradley of the North County Times,
    I am NOT trying to change the subject.
    I am saying that people, such as Bradley J Fikes, should make the effort to control their own destiny.

    1. You should purchase BradleyFikes.com and BradleyJFikes.com at $8/yr for each.
    2. You should set up @BradleyJFikes on Twitter before someone else does.
    3. You were smart enough to get http://www.facebook.com/bradleyfikes
    4. And, you have 2 accounts on LinkedIn. Not sure why two are better than one. But, Two are better than zero.

  4. Dave:
    I’m not sure about this anymore …
    How about BradleyFikes.net? BradleyJFikes.org? .xxx? .sfo? .green? etc., etc.
    With 72 new extensions in the pipeline, that’s a lot of sites …

  5. djx said:

    Dave:
    Always interesting reading apologists for unethical businesses.

  6. Dave Barnes said:

    at djx,
    “Dave:
    Always interesting reading apologists for unethical businesses.”
    Huh?
    1. I am not apologizing for anything.
    2. What unethical business?